In this bulletin:
1. B/VILLE — Bougainville leaders endorse final position and recommend 2030 Independence declaration date
2. VAN — Newly appointed Director General welcomed by the MSG Secretariat staff
3.SOL — U.S pours additional US$6M into UXO clearance in Solomon Islands
4. FIJI — 5000 people in Fiji may be living with HIV without knowing it
5. UN — Deep-sea mining talks end without a framework… again
6. FIJI — 70 percent of CWM surgeries linked to Fiji diabetic foot complications
7. PACNEWS BIZ — FSM President signs National Agriculture Investment Plan to boost Food security
8. PACNEWS BIZ — Telecom Fiji to host Pacific Fibre Conference on 30 – 31 July
9. PACNEWS BIZ — Jackson’s airport redevelopment key to PNG’s regional hub plans
10. PACNEWS BIZ — Tatiana Proskuryakova appointed World Bank Group director for the North and South Pacific
11. PACNEWS BIZ — Fiji Sugar Corporation on track to meet sugar export quota, says Minister
12. PACNEWS IN FOCUS — Drawing a line in the ocean
13. PACNEWS DIGEST — Strengthening Weather Services in the Pacific: Fiji Fiji Meteorological Service delivers forecasting trainning in Kiribati
14. PACNEWS DIGEST — Beyond border security – Can accountability thrive without media freedom?
B/VILLE – INDEPENDENCE STRUGGLE: ABG GOVT PACNEWS 1: Tue 28 Jul 2026
Bougainville leaders endorse final position and recommend 2030 Independence declaration date
BUKA, 28 JULY 2026 (ABG GOVT) —The Bougainville Independence Leaders Consultation Forum (BILCF) has endorsed the final Bougainville position and recommended 01 September 2030 as the proposed date for Bougainville’s declaration of Independence.
The Forum, chaired by Autonomous Bougainville Government (ABG) President Ishmael Toroama and Vice President Ezekiel Masatt, brought together political leaders, veterans, civil society, community and youth representatives to reaffirm Bougainville’s agreed pathway towards independence.
Vice President Masatt presented the final Bougainville position, which was formally presented to the National Government in Kokopo last month.
The position outlines a three-stage pathway comprising preparation for self-government until 01 September 2027, a period of self-government from 2027 to 2030, and independence in 2030, consistent with the definition of independence contained on the 2019 Referendum ballot paper.
Vice President Masatt said Bougainville remained committed to the Bougainville Peace Agreement despite recent developments in the National Parliament.
“Since the last time we had our meeting, many things have moved on; things like the National Government introducing the three-quarter voting threshold in the sessional order. We know that as a response, the Final Bougainville Position was presented with our timelines,” he said.
“Despite the disagreements, we on the ABG side made a conscious decision that despite what appears to be a strategy on the part of the National Government to make ratification fail, Bougainville will remain committed to stay engaged through consultations in respect of the Bougainville Peace Agreement.”
President Toroama reaffirmed that the Forum exists to guide Bougainville’s political leadership throughout the consultation process on the referendum outcome.
“We are consulting over the referendum results only, which is independence, and not on any other package,” President Toroama said.
“In the last term and this term, the Government has totally represented and protected the aspirations of the people on independence. Our stand on Bougainville’s independence is clear.”
President Toroama also acknowledged the work of the ABG Public Service, led by the Chief Secretary, in aligning government legislation, policies and service delivery with the Final Bougainville Position.
The Forum received strong support from veterans, who endorsed the Final Bougainville Position and called for national reconciliation between Papua New Guinea and Bougainville before 01 September 2027.
Civil society and women’s representatives also endorsed the position and called for continued government support to provide accurate information for community awareness.
Among its key resolutions, the Forum:
• Endorsed the Final Bougainville Position.
• Recommended 01 September 2030 as Bougainville’s Independence Declaration date.
• Reaffirmed Bougainville’s commitment to uphold the Bougainville Peace Agreement in good faith.
• Called for the completion of the Bougainville Independence Constitution in line with the agreed timeline.
• Recommended accelerating Bougainville’s international engagement and lobbying.
• Called for national reconciliation to commence before ratification in the National Parliament and conclude before 01 September 2027, including an extended process of reconciliation with the Solomon Islands.
• Called on Constituency Members, civil society and faith-based organisations to lead Bougainville-wide independence awareness, peacebuilding and reconciliation.
The BILCF further resolved that Bougainville’s leaders and technical officials have no mandate to continue discussions in the event that the National Parliament ratification outcome does not endorse Bougainville independence referendum result, while reaffirming their commitment to achieving Bougainville’s political independence through peaceful means.
The Forum also recommended that the ABG raise concerns at the forthcoming Joint Supervisory Body meeting regarding the sessional order process as a matter of record on the parties’ commitment to the Bougainville Peace Agreement.
The Bougainville Independence Leaders Consultation Forum last met in March 2025.
The recommendations adopted reaffirm Bougainville’s united position and provide clear political direction for the next phase of the independence readiness process. …..PACNEWS
VAN – DIPLOMACY: MSG SECRETARIAT PACNEWS 1: Tue 28 Jul 2026
Newly appointed Director General welcomed by the MSG Secretariat staff
PORT VILA, 28 JULY 2026 (MSG SECRETARIAT)—The Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG) Secretariat has officially welcomed its newly appointed Director General, Dr Anna Naupa, who assumed her duties Monday, 27 July 2026, at the Secretariat’s headquarters in Port Vila, Vanuatu.
It marks an important moment for the Secretariat and for the wider Melanesian family, as the organisation continues to advance the shared priorities of its Member Countries and uphold the founding values of Melanesian solidarity, cooperation, respect, and collective progress.
This historic appointment also marks Dr Naupa as the first female and first ni-Vanuatu Director General of the MSG Secretariat, an achievement that carries profound significance and offers renewed hope and inspiration to women and girls across Melanesia.
Ilan Kiloe, who served as Acting Director General during the transition period, extended his warm congratulations to Dr. Naupa and reaffirmed the Secretariat’s full support for her leadership.
“The Secretariat looks forward to working under Dr. Naupa’s leadership as we continue to advance the shared priorities of our Member Countries and strengthen Melanesian solidarity,” said Kiloe.
As the Secretariat enters this new chapter, it reaffirms its commitment to teamwork, transparency, and transformative action across the foundational pillars of political, economic, and cultural cooperation.
In assuming office during Vanuatu’s independence anniversary period, Dr Naupa acknowledged the enduring wisdom, strength, and courage of the region’s founding leaders, whose vision continues to guide the collective aspirations of Melanesia.
Dr Naupa also reflected on her personal connection to Vanuatu’s national journey, recalling the public service of her late father, who served as Minister of Health and Minister of Public Works, and the contribution of her mother as an educator/Teacher at Malapoa College, where many of Vanuatu’s contemporary leaders were shaped.
Outlining her immediate strategic priorities, Dr Naupa emphasised her commitment to strengthening the Secretariat’s Corporate Services, Political, and Trade programmes to better serve the MSG membership and support the implementation of Leaders’ decisions.
The MSG Secretariat extends its highest regards to Dr Naupa and wishes her every success as she undertakes this esteemed role at the helm of the organisation…..PACNEWS
SOL – UXO DISPOSAL: INDEPTH SOLOMONS PACNEWS 1: Tue 28 Jul 2026
U.S pours additional US$6M into UXO clearance in Solomon Islands
HONIARA, 28 JULY 2026 (INDEPTH SOLOMONS)—Solomon Islands Prime Minister Matthew Wale has announced a major boost to the country’s unexploded ordnance (UXO) clearance efforts, after securing an additional SBD$50M(USD$6 million) in funding from the United States.
He made the announcement following his return from high-level engagements in Washington and Tokyo last week.
To ensure the funds translate immediately into action on the ground, the Prime Minister confirmed that the government has signed a release to bypass existing regulatory bottlenecks, paving the way for a rapid expansion of clearance operations.
“The U.S has given an additional USD 6 million towards support for the UXO,” Prime Minister Wale stated.
“That SBD$50 million(USD$6 million), we have signed a release not to be constrained by the current regulatory constraints so that more people can be engaged with the UXO clearance work.”
The removal of these constraints is designed to dramatically increase the number of personnel and local contractors engaged in clearing the deadly World War II legacy munitions that continue to threaten communities, particularly across Guadalcanal.
Wale said that the responsibility now lies with the Solomon Islands to maximize the impact of this new financial support, framing it as a critical test for future international assistance.
“It is critical,” the Prime Minister warned. “If that fund is well utilised, they will continue to support us with UXO clearance.”
The funding package was finalised during Prime Minister Wale’s bilateral meetings with U.S. officials, including Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau, in Washington D.C.
The eight-day overseas diplomatic tour also included a visit to Japan for talks with Japanese leadership aimed at strengthening independent, bilateral partnerships.
Solomon Islands remains one of the most heavily contaminated nations in the Pacific from World War II-era munitions.
Supported by new U.S funds and reduced regulatory hurdles, the accelerated clearance program is expected to expand operations, protect local communities, and free up land for infrastructure and agriculture……PACNEWS
FIJI – HIV/AIDS/HEALTH: FIJI SUN PACNEWS 1: Tue 28 Jul 2026
5000 people in Fiji may be living with HIV without knowing it
SUVA, 28 JULY 2026 (FIJI SUN)—An estimated 5000 people in Fiji could be living with HIV without knowing it, as health officials race to identify undiagnosed cases amid what has been described as the world’s fastest-growing HIV epidemic.
The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) estimates that about 8900 people were living with HIV in Fiji in 2025. However, the Ministry of Health and Medical Services has confirmed only 2016 cases, leaving thousands of people who may be carrying the virus without diagnosis or treatment.
Dr Emily Tuirara, Prevention Lead for the National Outbreak Response Taskforce within the ministry’s HIV Unit, said the gap underscored the urgent need for more people to come forward for testing.
“From 2022 to 2025, we saw a 300 percent increase in HIV cases. That alone speaks of the gravity of the HIV crisis in our country.
“The increasing numbers also show that more people are coming forward for testing and treatment,” she said.
Before 2022, Fiji’s HIV epidemic was classified as low prevalence. It was reclassified as a concentrated epidemic in 2023, meaning infections were largely confined to specific population groups.
By 2025, the epidemic had become generalised after HIV infections were detected among pregnant women and babies, indicating wider community transmission.
Dr Tuirara said the rapid rise in confirmed cases reflected the scale of the outbreak.
“From 2019, we had 220 confirmed HIV cases. Between 2022 and 2023, the number increased from 245 to 415. From 2023 to 2024, cases rose sharply from 415 to 1853, before reaching 2016 people living with HIV in 2025.
“Those are only the cases we know about – people who have come forward for testing and treatment. UNAIDS estimates there were about 8900 people living with HIV in Fiji in 2025, which means we have yet to identify around 5000 people who may be living with the virus,” Dr Tuirara said.
Assistant Minister for Health Penioni Ravunawa said HIV was both preventable and manageable, and urged people not to avoid testing.
“What we want to tell the public is that HIV is preventable. If you understand how the virus is transmitted, it can be prevented. It is also manageable. Medication and health support are available, and people diagnosed with HIV can live normal lives.”
Ravunawa said HIV prevention needed to be openly discussed at every level of society….PACNNEWS
UN – DEEP SEA MINING: OCEANGRAPHIC MAGAZINE PACNEWS 1: Tue 28 Jul 2026
Deep-sea mining talks end without a framework… again
KINGSTON, 28 JULY 2026 (OCEANGRAPHIC MAGAZINE)—Two weeks of negotiations at the International Seabed Authority (ISA) have concluded with the regulatory framework for deep-sea mining no closer to completion and the scientific, legal and governance arguments for a moratorium stronger than when talks began.
The ISA Council session – which ended this week – was marked by a series of developments that conservation groups and legal observers say collectively ‘point in one direction’.
The ISA’s own Legal and Technical Commission highlighted significant gaps in the science and baseline data needed to establish reliable environmental thresholds for deep-sea mining.
Key components of the wider regulatory framework – including standards and guidelines, benefit-sharing regulations and other governance measures – remain either unfinished or yet to be substantially negotiated.
The Mining Code itself continues to be negotiated, with no resolution in sight.
The session took place against the backdrop of a significant legal development.
An international tribunal had just ruled against a mining contractor that had tried to block the ISA’s own investigation into whether it had broken the rules – meaning that investigation can now proceed.
During the session, the Council voted to extend the exploration contract of Nauru Ocean Resources Inc, but governments were careful to stress that renewing the contract was ‘not a sign of approval’ for how the company had behaved, and that the outcome of the investigation remained entirely open.
Nauru Ocean Resources Inc is publicly linked to The Metals Company, a U.S firm that has been attempting to mine the international seabed without going through the ISA process – an act that is widely considered to be illegal under international law.
That attempt to sidestep the system was a recurring concern throughout the Council session, with governments warning that allowing companies to bypass the ISA framework would undermine one of the foundational principles of international ocean law: that the deep seabed, and its resources, belong to all of humanity.
“Over the past two weeks, governments have been presented with more evidence that it would be dangerous to allow deep-sea mining to start under the current conditions,” said Sofia Tsenikli, Global Campaign Director of the Deep Sea Conservation Coalition.
“The science is not there. The compliance inquiry is ongoing. The regulatory and governance framework remains absent. Unlawful mining attempts continue unchallenged by States and the International Seabed Authority. None of these points towards deep-sea mining. It points towards precaution. It points toward a moratorium. States’ inaction is in itself a threat to our common heritage; time to act now.”
The DSCC’s Policy Advisor, Emma Wilson, said the ITLOS ruling represented a step forward but that the ISA’s response to contractor non-compliance had exposed deeper institutional weaknesses.
“The ITLOS orders mean the inquiry can now move forward. However, the decisions of this week show the Authority once again hindered by its outdated processes to move swiftly on companies breaking international law,” she said.
“By delaying action on unlawful mining, the ISA is undermining confidence in its ability to regulate the industry. If it cannot enforce the rules, it cannot manage exploitation. Meanwhile, governments must take action now to prevent their own companies and nationals from facilitating unilateral deep-sea mining in any way.”
Duncan Currie, DSCC Legal Advisor, said the moment now called for governments to move from statements to action.
“Governments have spoken repeatedly about defending the common heritage of humankind, but words alone will not protect it. States now need to show that they are prepared to stand up to companies seeking to undermine the international system. The Law of the Sea Convention requires nothing less. Forty-three governments already support a moratorium or precautionary pause. The Assembly is an opportunity for others to join them.”
The ISA Assembly – the body’s plenary decision-making forum – now provides the next opportunity for governments to act.
The DSCC is calling on states to back a moratorium as the multilateral response needed to protect the common heritage of humankind, defend international law and deter further attempts to mine the international seabed outside the frameworks designed to govern it……PACNEWS
FIJI – HEALTH: FIJI SUN PACNEWS 1: Tue 28 Jul 2026
70 percent of CWM surgeries linked to Fiji diabetic foot complications
SUVA, 28 JULY 2026 (FIJI SUN) —Seven in every 10 surgeries performed at the Colonial War Memorial Hospital (CWM)l are for diabetic foot complications, highlighting the growing toll of late diabetes treatment in Fiji.
Diabetic foot surgery now accounts for 70 percent of all surgical procedures performed at the Colonial War Memorial Hospital, with patients continuing to seek medical treatment only after serious complications develop, Assistant Minister for Health Penioni Ravunawa says.
Ravunawa said many people with diabetes were still turning to herbal remedies and faith-based treatments before seeking professional medical care, despite years of public awareness campaigns.
“Unfortunately, with our communal system in Fiji, we tend to rely on herbal medicine and certain faith-based beliefs. People often resort to these first and only come to hospital when their diabetes complications have reached an advanced stage,” he said.
He said the delays were undermining the work of healthcare professionals and village health workers, who continued to educate communities on preventing non-communicable diseases.
“As you know, we have more than 220 village health workers across the country. Their role is to educate villagers and people in settlements and communities on how to take care of their health through healthy food choices, regular physical activity and adequate rest. All of these are important.”
The warning comes as the 2025 Fiji STEPS Survey showed diabetes continues to affect a significant proportion of the population.
The survey found 16.5 percent of Fijians are living with diabetes. Of those, 46.5 percent were aware of their condition, while 71 percent of those diagnosed were taking diabetes medication, including insulin.
Diabetes affected 4.7 percent of people aged 18 to 29, with the prevalence rising sharply to 36.5 percent among those aged 60 to 69.
The average age of people living with diabetes was 47.6 years, with women accounting for 53.7 percent of cases.
The Western Division recorded the highest prevalence at 18.2 percent, followed by the Central Division at 16.9 percent…..PACNEWS
PACNEWS BIZ
FSM – AGRICULTURE: FSM GOVT PACNEWS BIZ: Tue 28 Jul 2026
FSM President signs National Agriculture Investment Plan to boost Food security
POHNPEI, 28 JULY 2026 (FSM GOVT) — Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) President Wesley Simina has signed the National Agriculture Investment Plan (NAIP), describing it as a major step towards strengthening the country’s food systems, supporting farmers and building resilience against climate-related challenges.
The plan was signed during a ceremony at the Office of the President in Palikir on 20 July, attended by state lieutenant governors, cabinet ministers, representatives of the United Nations, national and state governments, and development partners.
The National Agriculture Investment Plan was developed through consultations involving the national government, the four state governments, farmers, communities and other stakeholders. Its preparation was supported under the Small Islands Food and Water Project and implemented by the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO).
The plan sets out a national framework for agricultural investment with five priority areas: increasing crop production and productivity, strengthening the livestock sector, improving biosecurity services, promoting high-value horticulture and local market linkages, and expanding training, capacity building and institutional support.
President Simina acknowledged the contributions of state governments, communities, farmers, technical experts and stakeholders who helped develop the plan through consultations across Yap, Chuuk, Pohnpei and Kosrae.
He also thanked FAO for its support through the Small Islands Food and Water Project.
While marking the signing as an important milestone, President Simina stressed that implementation would determine the plan’s success.
“Today, however, our work is only beginning,” President Simina said. “The true measure of this Plan will not be the quality of the document itself, but the results it delivers.”
United Nations Multi-Country Office for Micronesia Officer in Charge, Dr Rodrigo Ofrin, congratulated the FSM Government and the Department of Resources and Development on the completion of the plan and highlighted the collaborative process behind its development.
He said implementation would require sustained political commitment, effective coordination between national and state governments, strong community participation and continued support from development partners.
“The true measure of success will not be today’s signing, but the implementation that follows,” Dr Ofrin said. “Turning this vision into tangible results will require sustained political commitment, effective coordination across national and state governments, meaningful participation of local communities, and continued engagement from partners across all sectors.”
Dr Ofrin reaffirmed the United Nations’ commitment to supporting implementation through institutional strengthening, investment mobilisation, innovation, evidence-based policymaking and partnerships.
President Simina also highlighted the need to invest in young people by creating opportunities in modern agriculture through innovation, entrepreneurship, science, technology and sustainable resource management.
Highlighting the threat posed by the approaching El Niño season, he said the country could not afford to delay action.
“The El Niño season before us reminds us that we cannot wait until a crisis arrives before taking action,” the President said. “This National Agriculture Investment Plan represents our commitment to invest before those challenges become emergencies—to strengthen our food systems, safeguard our natural resources, support our farmers, and build lasting resilience for future generations.”
The National Agriculture Investment Plan provides a coordinated framework for agricultural development and investment, with its success expected to depend on continued cooperation between national and state governments, farmers, communities, traditional leaders, educational institutions, the private sector and development partners……PACNEWS
PAC – TELECOMMUNICATON MEET: FIJI SUN PACNEWS BIZ: Tue 28 Jul 2026
Telecom Fiji to host Pacific Fibre Conference on 30-31 July
SUVA, 28 JULY 2026 (FIJI SUN)—Regional and international telecommunications leaders will gather in Fiji on 30 – 31 July for the Pacific Fibre Conference 2026, as the region looks to strengthen digital connectivity and prepare for an increasingly AI-powered future.
Hosted by Telecom Fiji, the two-day conference will bring together policymakers, technology partners, network operators, investors, regulators and industry experts to discuss the future of digital infrastructure across the Pacific.
Telecom Fiji said collaboration would be critical to achieving the region’s digital ambitions.
The conference will provide a platform for participants to exchange ideas, explore emerging technologies, discuss infrastructure investment and identify partnerships to accelerate connectivity across Pacific island countries.
Telecom Fiji said the discussions and partnerships formed during the conference would help shape the digital infrastructure needed to support the Pacific’s future economy and ensure the region is well positioned to participate in the rapidly evolving AI era.
The company said the conference also aimed to foster collaboration, encourage investment and strengthen the digital foundations needed to support sustainable economic growth, innovation and inclusive development throughout the Pacific…..PACNEWS
PNG – AIRPORT: ISLANDS BUSINESS PACNEWS BIZ: Tue 28 Jul 2026
Jackson’s airport redevelopment key to PNG’s regional hub plans
PORT MORESBY, 28 JULY 2026 (ISLANDS BUSINESS)—The redevelopment of Jackson’s International Airport in Papua New Guinea’s capital, Port Moresby, has been described as a major investment in aviation, tourism and trade ambitions.
Prime Minister Marape said the upgrade carried out by the National Airports Corporation in partnership with AG Investment Limited and other stakeholders, would modernise the country’s main international gateway and help position Papua New Guinea as a regional hub in the Asia-Pacific.
“The progress our people are now witnessing at Jacksons International Airport is a clear sign that Papua New Guinea is building for the future,” Marape said.
He said the airport was more than a transport facility and described it as the first impression for visitors, investors and business travellers entering the country.
“Jacksons International Airport is more than an airport. It is the front door to our nation,” he said.
“Every visitor, investor, tourist and business traveler forms their first impression of Papua New Guinea here. We therefore have a responsibility to build a world-class gateway that reflects the confidence, potential and aspirations of our country.”
The redevelopment is expected to be delivered in four phases. It includes expansion of the domestic terminal, new passenger processing areas, additional check-in counters, aerobridges, upgraded baggage systems, VIP lounges and commercial space, as well as improved access for people with disabilities.
Plans also call for expansion of aircraft parking aprons, a new international terminal with modern security screening and self-service technologies, and a future runway extension from about 2.75 km to 3.5 km, along with new taxiways, cargo facilities and maintenance infrastructure.
Marape said passenger traffic through Jacksons reached about PGK$1.68 million(US$370,000) in 2025 and was expected to keep rising over the next two decades.
“The redevelopment is designed not only to meet future passenger demand but also to significantly improve operational efficiency and the overall travel experience,” he said.
He linked airport work to a wider economic agenda that includes tourism, logistics, agriculture, trade and downstream industries, saying strategic infrastructure spending would create jobs and support long-term growth.
“Every kina invested in strategic infrastructure creates opportunities far beyond the construction site,” he said.
“This airport redevelopment will stimulate tourism, facilitate trade, strengthen business confidence, improve connectivity and generate thousands of employment opportunities for Papua New Guineans during construction and long after completion.”
Marape said the airport project complements other transport investments, including the restoration of the Port Moresby-Narita air route, the Connect PNG programme and port upgrades.
He said a modern airport would help signal that Papua New Guinea is open for tourism and business and ready to compete internationally.
The prime minister also praised the National Airports Corporation board, acting Managing Director Dominic Kaumu, AG Investment Limited, contractors, engineers and workers involved in the project.
“This is not simply about constructing buildings. It is about building national confidence, strengthening our economy, creating opportunities for our people and presenting Papua New Guinea to the world through a gateway that truly reflects the greatness of our nation,” he said……PACNEWS
PAC – BANK CHIEF: WORLD BANK PACNEWS BIZ: Tue 28 Jul 2026
Tatiana Proskuryakova appointed World Bank Group director for the North and South Pacific
SUVA, 28 JULY 2026 (WORLD BANK)—Tatiana Proskuryakova has been appointed World Bank Group (WBG) Division Director for the North and South Pacific, effective July, 2026.
Proskuryakova will oversee the World Bank Group’s engagement in the Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, Naoero, Palau, Samoa, Tonga, and Tuvalu.
“The Pacific is at the forefront of some of the world’s most pressing challenges, but also has enormous opportunities,” said Proskuryakova.
“I look forward to working closely with our government partners, the private sector, development partners and communities to help create jobs, build stronger economies and deliver lasting benefits for Pacific people.”
Proskuryakova will oversee a portfolio of WBG support that is helping Pacific countries create jobs and strengthen resilience through better health services, digital connectivity, climate-resilient transport, and stronger financial systems.
These investments, together with wider WBG budget support and knowledge products, across the North and South Pacific aim to improve services, open new economic opportunities and build a more resilient future for communities.
Proskuryakova previously served as the World Bank’s Regional Director for Central Asia. She brings more than three decades of World Bank Group experience across Central Asia, Eastern Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean…..PACNEWS
FIJI – SUGAR INDUSTRY: FIJI SUN PACNEWS BIZ: Tue 28 Jul 2026
Fiji Sugar Corporation on track to meet sugar export quota, says Minister
SUVA, 28 JULY 2026 (FIJI SUN)—The Fiji Sugar Corporation (FSC) remains on track to meet its sugar export quota this season despite delays to the start of crushing, with any surplus sugar to be sold on the local market.
Minister for Agriculture, Waterways and Sugar Tomasi Tunabuna gave the assurance following claims of sugar shortages at some supermarkets around the country.
Tunabuna said there had been no major complaints lodged with the Ministry of Sugar about shortages and that imported sugar had been secured as a contingency against any future supply disruptions.
He said the FSC had sufficient sugar stocks to meet local demand, while imported sugar had been arranged as a backup should supplies tighten.
“FSC anticipated that delays to this season’s harvest could affect sugar supply, so it made preparations to secure backup stocks,” Tunabuna said.
He said the decision to import sugar was a precautionary measure to address any potential shortages caused by delays to the harvesting season.
“It was triggered by the low supply of cane at the start of the crushing season,” he said.
Tunabuna said New Zealand was among the countries Fiji had explored as a source of imported sugar.
When asked about the cost of the imports, he said the FSC held the relevant figures and declined to comment further.
Tunabuna said he remained optimistic the FSC would meet its export quota this season while ensuring any surplus sugar was made available on the local market.
Supermarkets in Labasa continue to report a consistent supply of sugar.
Meanwhile, fears of a sugarcane harvest boycott in Vanua Levu have failed to materialise, with 82 percent of northern farmers signing harvesting agreements and supplying cane to the Fiji Sugar Corporation’s Labasa mill, Minister for Agriculture, Waterways and Sugar Tomasi Tunabuna says.
Tunabuna said harvesting and crushing operations in the North had remained on track despite earlier claims that farmers would boycott the season.
He said 82 percent of farmers in Vanua Levu had signed the Memorandum of Gang Agreement (MOGA), allowing harvesting gangs comprising growers, cutters and transporters to supply cane to FSC mills.
“I am very particularly happy with the farming community in the North for their perseverance and resilience in carrying out their harvesting duties,” he said.
“They decision to sign the MOGA reflected on their willingness to address the existing sugarcane supply shortage being witnessed around the country.”
Tunabuna said reports from the ground showed there had been no disruption to cane supply at the Labasa mill.
“I haven’t heard of complaints of low sugarcane supply to FSC Labasa mill as per the ground reports received,” he clarified.
He also dismissed claims that scheduled mill shutdowns were caused by low cane supply.
“Simply we can’t wait for our mills to experience a major break down and then we start with maintenance work, so we crush six days while on Sunday is reserved for repairs and maintenance,” the line minister said.
The minister said attention had now shifted to encouraging growers in the Western Division to maintain cane supply.
Seaqaqa farmer Atish Kumar said he chose to begin harvesting because his family’s financial needs came first.
“We respect his stand for us, but, I believe farmers need to harvest cane and leave the negotiations between the NFU and Government.”
Another farmer, Ilisoni Nate, said rising fuel prices had increased harvesting costs, but he continued cutting cane because of financial commitments.
He hoped Government would consider increasing the cane price.
“For Seaqaqa sector, we contribute one of the highest cane supplies to FSC Labasa mill, so our farmers deserve an increase from the current $85(US$42.50) per tonne.”
Tunabuna said he remained willing to meet National Farmers Union general secretary Mahendra Chaudhry to discuss the future of the sugar industry.
However, he expressed disappointment that Chaudhry had not attended any of the four sugar consultation meetings held in the Western Division.
“We had four sugar consultation sessions in the West, but, for Chaudhry’s to say he is representing the best interests of farmers, he was not seen in any of the sessions,” he said.
Tunabuna said a letter from Chaudhry to his office and the Prime Minister’s Office outlined farmers’ demands that should be addressed before crushing began.
“In the letter, it was made clear Mr Chaudhry was highlighting on the demands requested to be met by Government and no indication of boycotting the season,” he said.
He added that he had invited Mr Chaudhry to meet him but had not received a response……PACNEWS
PACNEWS In Focus
The views expressed in PACNEWS are those of agencies contributing articles and do not necessarily those of PINA and/or PACNEWS
Efforts to settle the maritime boundary between Vanuatu and New Caledonia continue to be blocked by France’s attachment to two uninhabited islands
By Nic Maclellan
NOUMEA/PORT VILA, 28 JULY 2026 (INSIDE STORY)—After years of unsuccessful talks, the Vanuatu government has walked away from negotiations with France over its maritime boundary with the neighbouring French Pacific colony of New Caledonia. At the heart of the dispute is sovereignty over two uninhabited volcanic islands, Umaenupne (Matthew) and Umaeneag (Hunter), located east of New Caledonia and southeast of Vanuatu.
Conflicting claims to Matthew and Hunter date back to before the joint French–British condominium of New Hebrides gained independence as Vanuatu in 1980. Since then, repeated French assertions of sovereignty have angered not just governments in Port Vila but also the Kanak independence movement in New Caledonia, which supports Vanuatu’s position in the dispute.
The national councils of chiefs in both Melanesian nations — the Malvatumauri in Vanuatu and the Senat coutumier in New Caledonia — agree Matthew and Hunter belong to Vanuatu. Citing legend, oral tradition and cultural pathways, customary leaders in both countries have jointly recognised the cultural connections between the two islands and Vanuatu’s southern province.
So why have these two isolated, rocky outcrops been disputed for more than four decades? And why do indigenous Kanak in New Caledonia support their Melanesian neighbour, to the anger of French officials in Paris and anti-independence politicians in Noumea?
France, with its far-flung colonial empire, gains significant economic and strategic benefits from the rules embedded in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. In Europe, hemmed in by other European states, its exclusive economic zone, or EEZ, is just 340,290 square kilometres. But with the EEZ extending up to 200 nautical miles from the low-water shoreline, France’s overseas dependencies add another eleven million square kilometres, giving Paris management and control over marine resources around every islet, reef and archipelago. Without its Pacific, Caribbean, Indian and Atlantic Ocean territories, France’s EEZ would rank forty-fifth in the world rather than second.
French governments have paid more attention to maritime policy over the past two decades, hosting the third UN Ocean Conference in Nice last year and extending the country’s military, environmental and maritime research programs. Despite a current moratorium on deep sea mining, exploration for seabed minerals, fisheries and deep-sea oil and gas is continuing in the Pacific, where France claims more than seven million square kilometres of EEZ around New Caledonia, French Polynesia, Wallis and Futuna and the uninhabited Clipperton Atoll.
In December 1975, half a decade before Vanuatu won independence, French troops installed a plaque on Hunter purporting to assert sovereignty — just as nineteenth-century French explorers had buried bottles on Pacific beaches to symbolise their annexation of territory. The following year France unilaterally declared a maritime zone off New Caledonia, taking in the disputed islands.
In 1983, after independence, a delegation of ni-Vanuatu officials and customary elders travelled to Hunter to raise the Vanuatu flag and remove the French plaque. Today Vanuatu regards Matthew and Hunter as part of its territory, and the country has even issued postage stamps depicting the two islands as part of the archipelago.
The French government was undeterred. In May 2007 it attempted to extend New Caledonia’s maritime boundaries beyond the traditional 200-mile EEZ limit by lodging a claim with the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. The dispute ramped up after Vanuatu issued fishing licenses for areas near Matthew and Hunter.
Since then, the Vanuatu government has sought support from other members of the Melanesian Spearhead Group, the sub-regional organisation that links four Melanesian states with New Caledonia’s independence movement, the Front de Libération Nationale Kanak et Socialiste, or FLNKS. From the mid-1980s, the Spearhead Group led diplomatic initiatives in support of New Caledonia’s independence from France, with the long-running dispute over Matthew and Hunter becoming one more front in the broader contest with Paris.
The debate over Matthew and Hunter is also driven by customary leaders in both countries. Meeting in Noumea in April 2009, chiefs from Vanuatu and New Caledonia signed a joint statement reaffirming — in customary law and Melanesian culture — Vanuatu’s right to Matthew and Hunter. “With regard to the annexation of the Matthew and Hunter Islands to New Caledonia and its dependencies,” they declared, “it must be considered that this act has no historical or customary basis and that, according to Melanesian tradition, these islands therefore belong to the Republic of Vanuatu.”
In July of that year, Vanuatu’s prime minister Edward Natapei and the FLNKS’s Victor Tutugoro travelled to Tanna in Tafea province, joining customary leaders to witness the signing of the Keamu Accord, described as “a solemn commitment between the Kanak people and the people of Vanuatu, that whatever the political and institutional future of New Caledonia, Matthew and Hunter Islands will always remain the property of the people of Vanuatu.”
“It was a great event,” Victor Tutugoro told me years later. “This customary exchange showed that Kanak chiefs renounced any claims, of any sort, over Matthew and Hunter, and that the sovereignty of the islands remained with the customary authorities of Vanuatu, especially from Tanna and Tafea province.”
The French government was angered by the agreement, Tutugoro recalled. “The French high commissioner reproached me several times that we were undercutting international negotiations over areas that could have significant resources, such as oil deposits or undersea minerals. Invariably, we’d reply to these people: we are acting according to law — these islands don’t belong to us, and the agreement is between brothers of the same culture. And we won’t go back on this. If tomorrow they discover great wealth around the islands, then it belongs to them.”
The Keamu Accord boosted Vanuatu’s pressure on France to defer its bid to extend New Caledonia’s continental shelf and come to the negotiating table.
For ni-Vanuatu, the dispute draws on deep memories of more than seven decades of French colonial rule. Speaking before the UN General Assembly in 2012, Sato Kilman, Vanuatu’s prime minister at the time, affirmed that the territorial dispute “is a reminder that we must continue to uphold the notion that the rule of law should not be used as an instrument of powerful nations to coerce weak and small nations, especially over territorial disputes.”
Delegations from France and Vanuatu finally met for a first round of negotiations in early 2018 at the University of New South Wales in Sydney. A second round followed in Brussels in June of the following year. But further talks scheduled for 2020 were delayed by the pandemic, and the process foundered until French president Emmanuel Macron visited Port Vila in July 2023, the first ever visit by a French president to post-independence Vanuatu. During his brief stay, Macron pledged that talks would resume by the end of the year — a cultural commitment to agreement sealed with a drink of kava.
Little happened, though, until newly elected Vanuatu prime minister Jotham Napat visited Paris in July last year to push for action. According to a joint statement from that meeting, “the two States expressed their willingness to identify a rapid and pragmatic solution.” Napat and Macron agreed officials would meet in Port Vila in November before formal negotiations resumed in Paris in early 2026.
Further progress was threatened after the November meeting — initially ignored by the French media — became controversial a month later. The conservative French newspaper Le Figaro speculated that the two islands could be ceded to Vanuatu and raised alarm over “the major geopolitical risks such a precedent could create.” Far-right politicians erupted at the perceived threat to French sovereignty, targeting Macron and angering the French government, which was doing everything possible to hold onto the islands.
Never one to miss an opportunity to denigrate Macron, Marine Le Pen, leader of the extreme-right party Rassemblement National, tweeted that national sovereignty “is neither negotiable nor something to be relinquished. The French people do not expect the Macronist government to carve up our overseas territories, which are real levers of power, influence and economic development, behind their backs.”
Her attack was echoed on social media by another far-right leader, Marion Maréchal, who argued that “the prospect of transferring our Pacific islets, Matthew and Hunter, to Vanuatu would represent a major strategic breach and blunder for France, threatening its heritage, security and credibility alike. It would be an affront to our national heritage, as these islets off the coast of New Caledonia are not mere specks of rock. They grant France a vast exclusive economic zone, rich in potential fisheries, energy and mineral resources.”
Surrendering the islands “would be a breach of our national security,” Maréchal thundered, “as any territorial cession sets a precedent. It would inevitably lead to further claims. The very credibility of the nation is at stake. By giving in, the President of the Republic would be committing a historic error in the eyes of France and the French people.”
In response, the French foreign ministry affirmed that “no cession of territory or renunciation of our sovereignty was discussed” during discussions with Vanuatu leaders. The Napat government was angered, since the unresolved issue of sovereignty over Matthew and Hunter is at the very heart of the maritime border dispute.
In the years since the signing of the 2009 Keamu Accord, the FLNKS has repeatedly reaffirmed its support for Vanuatu’s historic claim over the two islands. The issue erupted again in May this year when FLNKS president Christian Tein, arriving in Port Vila for a trade fair, casually told journalists that Matthew and Hunter belong to Vanuatu regardless of attempts to resolve the disputed maritime boundary.
FLNKS’s Mickaël Forrest, newly elected as provincial president of the Loyalty Islands, told me Tein’s statement was simply a reaffirmation of the long-held understanding between customary leaders in the two Melanesian nations. “All we did was to recall the historic connections, because these islands are part of the cultural heritage of Melanesian peoples,” he said. “This is nothing new — the status of these two islands is a matter between Melanesian peoples.”
“We’re aware that in the colonial context, there are discussions under way about these islands,” he added. “But even if it raises concern amongst some observers, there’s no problem on our part to repeat our longstanding position. For Kanak, for the FLNKS, for the Sénat coutumier, Matthew and Hunter are part of the Republic of Vanuatu’s natural heritage, full stop.”
In Vanuatu, meanwhile, prime minister Jotham Napat pledged that his government would not abandon its claim. “We will defend our sovereignty with determination,” he told parliament. “We have carefully evaluated all of the legal options that are available to us. We are trying the diplomatic pathway, but we are also ready to change strategy as soon as is necessary.”
Earlier this month Napat’s deputy, Johnny Koanapo, travelled to Paris for the long-awaited negotiations. But after two days of discussions with France’s Europe and foreign affairs minister Jean-Noël Barrot, neither country would budge on sovereignty. A statement from the French foreign ministry simply noted that “the minister reiterated the government’s position regarding French sovereignty over Matthew and Hunter Islands.”
At this point the Vanuatu government decided to abandon the process. Returning to Port Vila, Koanapo declared “we’re not going back to the bilateral discussions anymore.” He rejected France’s proposal to conclude a maritime boundary agreement while the sovereignty issue remained unresolved and said that New Caledonian representatives should have been involved in the talks.
“Our journey to full independence will not be complete until Vanuatu’s rightful ownership of Matthew and Hunter Islands is fully recognised,” Koanapo said. “Now that we have reached an impasse, Vanuatu will pursue other legal options available under international law. Let international law, let the International Court of Justice or any arbitration for that matter decide on this. To us, what France has done is an insult to us all,” he said ….PACNEWS
PACNEWS DIGEST
The views expressed in PACNEWS are those of agencies contributing articles and do not necessarily those of PINA and/or PACNEWS
Strengthening Weather Services in the Pacific: Fiji Meteorological Service delivers forecasting trainning in Kiribati
TARAWA, 28 JULY 2026 (FIJI MET SERVICE) —The Fiji Meteorological Service (FMS) has commenced a two-week Marine and Public Weather Forecasting Training and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Review for the Kiribati Meteorological Service in Tarawa, Kiribati, further strengthening regional collaboration and meteorological capacity across the Pacific.
Running from 27 July to 8 August 2026, the training brings together meteorological officers and forecasters from Kiribati to enhance their technical skills in marine and public weather forecasting, strengthen the communication of weather information, and review operational procedures to ensure they align with international best practices.
The initiative forms part of ongoing efforts to support the structured transition of forecasting responsibilities from the Fiji Meteorological Service to the Kiribati Meteorological Service, helping to establish and strengthen both marine and public weather forecasting functions within Kiribati’s National Meteorological Service.
Over the next two weeks, participants will undertake hands-on practical sessions, scenario-based exercises, and group discussions covering marine meteorology, forecast preparation and dissemination, early warning communication, and the review of Standard Operating Procedures.
Accurate and timely weather forecasts are essential for safeguarding lives, supporting livelihoods, and enabling informed decision-making—particularly for seafarers, fishermen, communities, and policymakers across the Pacific. Strengthening these capabilities will contribute to improved resilience and preparedness in the face of increasing climate-related risks.
Through initiatives such as this, the Fiji Meteorological Service remains committed to supporting Pacific National Meteorological and Hydrological Services by sharing expertise, fostering regional partnerships, and strengthening weather and climate services for a safer and more resilient Pacific…..PACNEWS
PACNEWS DIGEST
The views expressed in PACNEWS are those of agencies contributing articles and do not necessarily those of PINA and/or PACNEWS
Beyond border security – Can accountability thrive without media freedom?
Opinion by Alifereti Sakiasi
SUVA, 28 JULY 2026 (FIJI TIMES)—The concerns and arguments relating to Australia’s offshore processing policy have often been framed around border protection, deterrence and regional security.
Less attention, however, has been paid to another issue that sits at the heart of democratic accountability, which is, how easily can journalists, civil society organisations and the public scrutinise what happens in one of Australia’s closest Pacific partners?
This question has resurfaced following the latest assessment by CIVICUS (World Alliance for Citizen Participation), which revealed that Nauru continues to maintain restrictions that limit media freedom and freedom of expression, even as Australia deepens its financial and strategic partnership with the island nation.
The issue here is not whether Australia should support Nauru.
Few dispute that Canberra has legitimate strategic interests in the Pacific or that Nauru, as one of the world’s smallest and most isolated nations, requires significant external assistance to maintain essential public services.
Rather, the fundamental concern is whether a country investing hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars into another jurisdiction should also expect a level of transparency that allows those investments to be independently scrutinised.
The information gap
CIVICUS’ concerns extend beyond the treatment of asylum seekers.
The organisation argues that Nauru continues to reject key reforms aimed at strengthening civic space, including reducing the prohibitively high visa fees imposed on foreign journalists, decriminalising defamation and creating conditions for a more independent media landscape.
It also noted that all journalists are employed by the state-run Nauru Media Bureau, limiting the diversity of independent reporting. Nauru’s civic space continues to be rated as “Obstructed”.
Taken individually, each concern may appear to be a domestic governance issue.
Collectively, however, they raise a broader question.
Can independent scrutiny meaningfully exist when access for foreign journalists remains difficult, criminal defamation laws continue to exist, and independent media institutions remain limited?
For democratic societies, journalism performs a function beyond simply reporting events. It enables accountability by providing citizens with independently verified information about how governments exercise power and spend public money.
When those mechanisms become constrained, scrutiny inevitably becomes more difficult.
Australia’s financial stake
Australia’s relationship with Nauru is unlike that of most donor-recipient partnerships.
For more than a decade, Canberra has funded offshore processing on the island while simultaneously providing broader development assistance and direct budget support under an expanding economic, social and security partnership.
The relationship has grown beyond migration policy into one encompassing policing, infrastructure, banking, health, governance and regional security.
Australian governments have consistently argued that such assistance supports stability, development and resilience in the Pacific while helping maintain regional security amid increasing geopolitical competition.
These objectives are reflected throughout DFAT’s Pacific engagement policies and Australia’s official development assistance framework.
Canberra also maintains that Nauru, as a sovereign state, determines its own domestic laws and institutions, and that Australia cannot dictate internal legislative reform.
These are legitimate policy positions.
Yet sovereignty does not necessarily remove legitimate questions about accountability when substantial public funds are involved.
Transparency and taxpayer accountability
Successive parliamentary inquiries, legal experts and oversight bodies have repeatedly examined Australia’s offshore processing arrangements.
Among the recurring themes are transparency, value for money, parliamentary oversight and public accountability.
The current Senate inquiry into offshore processing arrangements, for example, is examining issues ranging from expenditure and contractual arrangements to transparency surrounding agreements with Nauru.
The Law Council of Australia has similarly argued that greater transparency and independent monitoring are necessary, including publication of key agreements to enable effective parliamentary scrutiny.
Recent reporting has also highlighted the scale of Australia’s financial commitment.
Despite expenditure amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars annually, advocates continue to argue that independent verification of conditions on the island remains difficult because of limited media access.
The relationship between transparency and accountability is not unique to Nauru.
Across democratic systems, governments are generally expected to demonstrate not only that public money is spent lawfully, but that sufficient independent oversight exists to allow citizens to evaluate whether public objectives are being achieved.
Why media freedom matters
This is where media freedom becomes more than a human rights issue.
It becomes a governance issue.
Restrictions on journalists do not simply affect news organisations.
They affect the broader ecosystem through which governments are held accountable.
Independent reporting allows taxpayers, parliamentarians and civil society to test official narratives against observable evidence.
Without that capacity, much of the public understanding of offshore processing relies on government statements, court proceedings or reports produced by advocacy organisations rather than sustained on-the-ground journalism.
That does not necessarily mean official accounts are inaccurate.
It does mean opportunities for independent verification become significantly narrower.
For Australia, this presents an uncomfortable paradox.
Canberra has long promoted democratic governance, transparency, accountability and media freedom as central pillars of its foreign policy across the Indo-Pacific.
At the same time, one of its closest operational partnerships continues with a country that international organisations argue maintains significant restrictions on media access and freedom of expression.
The apparent inconsistency has become a recurring point raised by organisations including CIVICUS, the Australian Human Rights Commission, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, all of which argue that Australia’s influence carries responsibilities extending beyond financial assistance.
A broader regional question
None of this suggests Australia should abandon its partnership with Nauru.
Nor does it imply that Australian funding is responsible for Nauru’s domestic media laws.
Rather, it poses a more nuanced policy question.
Should Australia’s significant financial, diplomatic and strategic influence also be used to encourage reforms that strengthen transparency, media freedom and independent oversight?
Governments routinely attach expectations to development partnerships in areas such as financial management, anti-corruption measures and institutional strengthening.
Whether media freedom deserves similar prominence is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.
In the Pacific, where geopolitical competition is intensifying and democratic resilience has become a recurring policy objective, the credibility of governance partnerships may increasingly depend not only on the amount of assistance provided, but on whether those partnerships also reinforce the openness and accountability that democratic governments publicly champion.
The debate now is ultimately no longer centred solely on the issue of offshore detention; in fact, it is more about whether independent scrutiny can be carried out across the borders where public policy is being implemented.
This analysis draws on the latest CIVICUS Monitor assessment of civic space in Nauru and the country’s 2025 Universal Periodic Review outcomes before the United Nations Human Rights Council. It also references Australian Government and parliamentary sources, including the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade’s Pacific and Official Development Assistance policy documents, the Department of Home Affairs, the Australian National Audit Office, and the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee’s inquiry into offshore processing arrangements. Additional context is drawn from reports and submissions by the Australian Human Rights Commission, UNHCR, the Law Council of Australia, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Reporters Without Borders and the Committee to Protect Journalists, as well as analysis by the Lowy Institute and the Australian Strategic Policy Institute on Australia’s Pacific engagement, regional security and governance…..PACNEWS
