Page 21 - IB January 2024
P. 21

COP28                                                                                             COP28


         Lavetanalagi Seru is Regional Coordinator at the Pacific   down the text or push for false solutions. COP28 saw over
        Islands Climate Action Network (PICAN) and shares his insights   2450 fossil fuel lobbyists and at least 475 carbon capture and
        post-COP.                                           storage lobbyists attend the climate negotiations in Dubai.
         “PICAN had a small team on the ground working alongside   “This, coupled with the COP28 Presidency being held by a
        nodes, members, allies and our Pacific negotiators to ensure   petro-state, resulted in a real mixed bag of outcomes.
        that COP28 delivered the course correction that is urgently   In the table below, PICAN gives its perspective on the
        needed to keep #1point5tostayalive and secure our futures.  progress and challenges presented by the COP28 outcomes
         “This work was made even more difficult as our Pacific   against its topline climate justice demands.
        negotiators, civil society representatives and activists
        navigated an increasingly captured space going up against an   richard@islandsbusiness.com
        unprecedented number of lobbyists working to either water



         Pacific Climate   Climate Justice Toplines   COP28 Outcomes
         Justice Demand

                                                     COP28  acknowledges  significant  gaps  in  finance  for  addressing
                                                   loss  and  damage,  with  a  focus  on  economic  and  non-economic
                          Prioritising support and   aspects,  especially  for  developing  countries,  with  the  decision  made
                          finance for communities   on operationalising a new Fund for loss and damage with around $700
         Loss and Damage  facing irreversible loss   million pledged to the Fund. However, this would seem to be a voluntary
                          and damage due to        fund  with  no  concrete  avenues  for  capitalisation. As  it  stands,  it  is  a
                          climate change.          tokenistic decision which will not be able to address the significant needs
                                                   of people and communities experiencing loss and damage.


                          Supporting safe, voluntary,   Appears  under  loss  and  damage  in  the  same  paragraph  where
                          and dignified migration   adaptation  actions  and  humanitarian  aid  are  noted,  which  does  not
         Climate Mobility  in the context of climate   adequately provide the space for climate mobility nor the recognition of
                          change.                  its severity in a 1.1C world.


                          Improving the quantity and   Emphasises challenges in accessing climate finance and encourages
                          quality of climate finance,   efforts to simplify access, especially for Least Developed Countries and
         Climate Finance   with a focus on adaptation   Small Island Developing States. Urges developed countries to deliver on
                          and the needs of frontline   the US$100 billion per year goal through 2025 and recognises the need
                          communities.             to scale up adaptation finance.

                          Halting the expansion of   However, whilst loss and damage is explicitly mentioned under the
         Fossil Fuels     fossil fuel industries and   finance section of the GST, the new collective quantified goal decision
                          transitioning to renewable   text does not even mention the term. This could be a real concern as
                          energy.                  from the outset, it does not set loss and damage as the third and missing
                                                   pillar of climate finance. In addition, the conversations on Article 2.1C
                                                   have  been  seriously  concerning  for  developing  countries  where  this
                                                   conversation, whilst important, is also seen to undermine the significant
                                                   responsibility of historic high emitters in the provision of finance that does
                                                   not enhance the debt burden of developing countries as they transition
                                                   away from fossil fuels.
                                                     It may seem positive that the Global Stocktake acknowledges the need
                                                   to reduce emissions from fossil fuels and emphasises the need to triple
                                                   renewable  energy  and  double  energy  efficiency  as  well  as  mentions
                                                   phasing out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies - the text we have is not the
                                                   clear market signal that this is the end of the fossil fuel era. What we
                                                   have is actually much more dangerous and insidious than we could have
                                                   hoped for. It is not aligned to the science that will limit warming to 1.5C.
                                                   The text explicitly recognises the role of transitional fuels (e.g. gas); is
                                                   focused mainly on transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems;
                                                   has no mention of differentiated timelines for developed and developing;
                                                   and has given a free hand in the acceleration of dangerous distractions
                                                   of abatement technologies without any definition of what this may mean.



                                                                                            Islands Business,  January 2024  21
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26