Page 31 - Islands Business October 2022
P. 31

Opinion                                                                                        Opinion





        be highly contested sphere of interest, in a wider geopoliti-  commentators have stated that this ‘initiative rides roughshod
        cal setting with external powers seeking to assert their own   over established regional processes’. The Partners have stated
        interests.” That in itself is an understatement – a misinter-  that they have a ‘strategic’ way of consulting with PIF and
        pretation.                                          other regional bodies to ensure utility. It remains to be seen,
          The paragraph continues: “In the current strategic context,   for example, how ANZ will be seated in any consultation with
        Leaders recognised the importance of remaining unified as a   PIF of which they are members, and which hats they would be
        Forum family to address common challenges and to capi-  wearing.
        talise on key opportunities.” What is unsaid is the status of   In trying to be bland to arrive at a consensus in its report-
        the existing disunity that has split the Forum family and the   ing, PIFS omits essential details. And these are what mat-
        prospect of Kiribati walking away from the group permanent-  ter. In recent situations, these are details that speak of the
        ly. What is also unsaid is what the Forum aims to do to get   absence of PIF’s unity and solidarity. A specific case discussed
        Kiribati and others into the fold to repair the disunity.  above is where Australia and NZ have breached PIF’s trust
          There is more. The same paragraph 9 still has to come   and have gone on to establish another regional grouping that
        to its punchline. It continues: “Furthermore, Leaders also   ‘rides roughshod over established regional processes.’ In the
        recognised the importance of regional unity and solidarity in   final analysis, it is this kind of power play that will continue
        dealing with intensifying geostrategic interest, particularly to   the unsolicited usurpation of PICs’ agency and their treatment
        ensure the achievement of shared and common objectives.”  as essentially pawns in the geostrategic games that developed
           What the Leaders did not discuss is that regional unity   countries love to play.
        and solidarity are already in tatters due to Australia and NZ’s
        geostrategic activities. Firstly, Australia followed up its sign-  editor@islandsbusiness.com
        ing onto the Indo-Pacific pact, as a member of the QUAD, by
        signing onto the AUKUS with the US and the UK. AUKUS has a   The author is a former Fijian Ambassador and Foreign
        nuclear component. The pact thus trashes PIF’s own Treaty of   Minister and runs his own consultancy company in Suva, Fiji.
        Rarotonga of 1985.
          Furthermore, what remains unsaid is that both Australia   The opinions expressed in this article are those of the
        and NZ have undermined the existing regional architecture by   author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of this
        signing onto the Partners in the Blue Pacific (PBP). Regional   publication.































                                     fijitraveller.com











                                                                                            Islands Business, October 2022  31
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36