Jun 07, 2020 Last Updated 3:16 AM, Jun 7, 2020

The Fiji National Provident Fund continues to be concerned by low levels of savings by its members on retirement and the need to extend its coverage to the informal sector.

The FNPF says that in 2019, 66 per cent of its members due to retire at some point over the next ten years have balances below F$10,000 (US$4561).

It says 88 per cent of its members earn below F$30k (US$13,864) per annum and 49 per cent withdraw funds for housing and other related family assistance within the social benefits scheme of the fund.

However on a more positive note, 32 per cent of members continue to consistently contribute to savings within the fund. FNPF highlighted 3,200 members have not fully complied with payments.

In terms of extending its coverage to the informal sector, the FNPF hopes to better assist its 125,000 members who fall into this category.

A detailed breakdown of this figure showed that 8,000 are farmers, 2,500 seasonal workers, 9,000 taxi drivers and 25,000 are domestic workers.

The reality of the discovery is that 128,000 members are retiring with low balances and 125,000 of these work in the informal sector.

FNPF CEO Jaoji Koroi stated: “the reality is now a problem and talking about it with the stakeholders should give us ideas of what can we can do to address these issues.”

The FNPF says these groups are susceptible to social problems, are unable to afford social protection and continued cycle of old age poverty.

Meanwhile the International Social Security Association (ISSA) has opened a branch in Fiji, hosted at FNPF, which aims to foster better social security and protection for the Pacific region.

Currently only Samoa and Fiji are members of ISSA, although the Association hopes other regional countries will join.

“ISSA is an organisation recognised for looking after social security and protection for countries all over the world and FNPF has a lot to learn from them,” Jaoji Koroi said at the branch launch.

editor@islandsbusiness.com

 

It has been three months since the Bank of Papua New Guinea (BPNG) adjusted the Kina Facility Rate (KFR) for the first time in more than six years. The KFR is intended to serve as the interest rate at which funds can be lent or borrowed overnight between banking institutions. In July, BPNG lowered the KFR by 25 basis points (bps) from 6.25 per cent to 6 per cent and then in August cut the KFR again by 50 bps to 5.5 per cent.

There are two main price indices used to measure inflation in PNG: the quarterly consumer price index (CPI), released by the National Statistical Office (NSO); and BPNG’s own monthly Retail Price Index (RPI). According to BPNG, the first KFR cut in July was motivated by the RPI in the first three months of 2019 indicating an average deflation of 2.3 per cent. However, as shown in Figure 1, prices in the economy measured by CPI during this period registered 4.5 per cent inflation, showing an entirely opposite price trend when compared to the RPI.

Figure 1 Inflation measures CPI vs RPI in PNG

Figure 1: Inflation measures (CPI vs RPI) in PNG (%)

The official explanation provided by BPNG on the second rate cut in August was also puzzling. Governor Loi Bakani’s press release in August stated: “In view of the on-going improvement in economic activity in the second quarter of 2019, with non-mineral private sector activities remaining robust and stability in other macroeconomic indicators, including inflation and exchange rate, [BPNG] decided to further ease its stance of monetary policy.” The statement goes against the standard practice of counter cyclical monetary policy. If economic activity was robust, the central bank should have considered lifting not reducing the KFR (with the aim of making borrowing more costly and thus slowing down economic activity and pushing down prices). 

But does any of this matter? Three months after the first easing, only one commercial bank in PNG, Bank of South Pacific (BSP) has revised its ‘indicator lending rate’ (ILR) downward while other banks have kept their respective ILR and deposit rates unchanged. Moreover, the BSP’s ILR was only revised downward by 10 bps, compared to the 75 basis point reduction in the KFR. 

Why is KFR pass-through so limited? The simple fact is that due to excess liquidity, banks hardly need to access the overnight money market, rendering the KFR impotent as a policy lever. Figure 2 shows the increasingly abundant excess liquidity in the PNG banking system (that is, short-term assets that are in excess of the banks’ liquidity needs).

Figure 2 Excess liquidity and the loan to deposit ratio

Figure 2: Excess liquidity and the loan-to-deposit ratio

The question then becomes, why is there excess liquidity?

Figure 2 also shows that on average, for every 1 kina received by commercial banks as a deposit from 2002 to 2019, only about 0.5 kina is loaned out to the market. The lack of lending in the economy is due to PNG’s structurally low lending environment, underpinned by a large unbanked population and less favourable business environment, although in recent years it has started to show some improvement. Furthermore, there is a massive spread between the very high rates at which funds are lent out by the banks, and the very low rates depositors receive on their accounts. Limited competition in the banking sector in PNG contributes to the persistently high interest spread (Figure 3). Competition in the banking industry has been further curtailed by the acquisition of ANZ Retail by Kina Bank in mid-2018, which  has reduced the number of retail bankers to just three. The spread shown in Figure 3 (that is, the difference between the lending and deposit rate) is in fact one of the highest in the East Asia and Pacific region, which explains why PNG’s banks are the most profitable in the region.

Figure 3 Deposit and lending rates and interest spread 

Figure 3: Deposit and lending rates and interest spread (%)

To get the KFR to work and, more importantly, to deliver economic growth, the government and central bank must reduce the interest rate spread and increase the demand for credit by creating a more favourable investment environment and allowing more competition to take place in the banking industry. Until then, any adjustments to the KFR, whatever the reasons, will achieve little. 

 

 

This article appeared first on Devpolicy Blog from the Development Policy Centre. 

Dek Sum is an Associate Lecturer at the Development Policy Centre, based at the University of Papua New Guinea, where he is a Visiting Lecturer and Project Coordinator for the ANU-UPNG partnership.

editor@islandsbusiness.com

Finding her avengers

  • Jun 07, 2020
  • Published in Sep-Oct

Business profile: Stella Muller

New Zealand-based Samoan entrepreneur and marketer Stella Muller has learnt some difficult lessons about when to hold on and when to loosen the reins as she has built her two businesses, Bright Sunday and Hot Samoan Boys. The vision behind Bright Sunday was to create a brand and marketing agency that was Pacific-owned, staffed and driven, Muller says. “What we are saying is that we are a collective of creatives that can offer Maori and Pacific ideas and strategies and ways of thinking for the world to access, because we’re an untapped source of creative potential.

.....to read more buy your personal copy at

Lifting the anchor

  • Jun 07, 2020
  • Published in August
Can more risk make state-owned banks more relevant?
A new Asian Development Bank report says Pacific state-owned banks need to change their attitude to risk if they are to fulfil their potential to improve competition and deepen the credit markets of Pacific island nations. The Finding Balance 2019 report profiles the roles, performance, market context, and regulatory framework of 13 state-owned banks in 10 Pacific island countries. It finds that as a group, these banks generated a very low financial return on their investment for their shareholders, and that the “underlying pressures on profitability need to be addressed if these banks are to play a longer term role.”
 

.....to read more buy your personal copy at

The Fiji National Provident Fund (FNPF), Fiji’s sole national pension fund may have been churning out multi-million-dollar profits over the years but running its nation-wide operation has also been a costly business.  in what is believed to be its highest bill ever, the fund revealed its total expenses topped over F$50million (US$23million) in 2018 alone, the bulk of which was spent on ‘general administration expenses’.  This was a marked increase from the F$39.47 million it incurred in total expenses in 2017, according to its 2018 annual report.

.....to read more buy your personal copy at

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
Ok Decline